In a real estate sale, the price paid by the buyer does not go directly to the seller. The funds pass through the notary’s office, which holds them in a dedicated account while a series of verifications are completed. This escrow mechanism, often seen as a blockage, meets specific legal obligations. Understanding these obligations allows for anticipating timelines and, if the situation drags on, activating the right levers.
Flow of funds and anti-money laundering rules: what holds up the transfer
The notary does not receive the money in just any account. The sale funds are deposited into a regulated escrow account, separate from the office’s own funds. This separation protects both the buyer and the seller in the event of the notary’s financial difficulties.
Read also : Discover how a mobile app is revolutionizing interactive real estate tours
A lesser-known point often causes frequent delays: the buyer’s contribution must come exclusively via bank transfer. Neither checks nor cash are accepted. If the transfer arrives incomplete or from an account that does not match the buyer’s identity, the notary suspends the process until rectification.
On the seller’s side, the constraint is symmetrical. The notary can only release the price to a bank account opened in the seller’s name, never to a third-party account. These rules stem from anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations (AML-CFT), which have tightened in recent years. As detailed by Tout Immo’s advice, this retention period is not at the notary’s discretion: it is governed by law.
Read also : Can a prescription be used twice for a blood test? Explanations and risks
Mortgage, lender’s privilege, and creditor opposition
After the signing of the final deed, the notary proceeds with the publication with the Land Advertising Service. This formality makes the sale enforceable against third parties, but it also opens a window during which creditors can come forward.
If a mortgage or lender’s privilege still encumbers the property, the notary must settle these debts before paying the balance to the seller. The corresponding amount is deducted directly from the sale price. As long as the release is not obtained, the funds remain blocked.
The situation becomes complicated when a creditor of the seller files an opposition with the notary. This procedure, provided for by the Civil Code, obliges the notary to hold the contested sum. The seller then only receives the uncontested portion, if it exists. The timelines depend on the creditor’s response and, in the event of a dispute, a judicial decision.
Common case: the unsettled bridge loan
A seller who financed a new purchase through a bridge loan may see part of the price withheld to directly repay the lending bank. The notary organizes this flow of funds with the banking institution. If the repayment statements are delayed, the release of the balance is also delayed.
Joint ownership, inheritance, and blockage among co-sellers
Sales conducted in a context of joint ownership or inheritance account for a significant portion of prolonged blockages. The notary can only distribute the price among the co-owners if all heirs have signed the sharing deed or given their written consent.
Several situations can lead to a deadlock:
- An heir refuses to sign the sharing deed, preventing any distribution of funds, even for consenting heirs.
- The inheritance declaration has not yet been filed with the tax authorities, and the notary is waiting for the final calculation of the taxes to be paid.
- A disagreement over the distribution of shares blocks the drafting of the deed, while the funds sit idle in the escrow account.
The notary cannot resolve a disagreement among heirs. Their role is limited to noting the agreement or waiting for a judge to rule. This nuance explains why certain situations can persist for months without the notary being held responsible for the delay.
Concrete measures to unblock funds after the sale
When the blockage period exceeds what seems reasonable, several levers exist. They can be activated in stages.
- A written formal notice sent to the notary by registered letter constitutes the first recourse. It formalizes the request and starts a response deadline.
- If the notary does not respond or delays without justification, a referral to the Departmental Chamber of Notaries can trigger a disciplinary review. The Chamber can intervene to expedite the processing of the file.
- In cases of proven fault (unjustified inertia, prolonged absence of response), the notary’s professional civil liability can be engaged before the judicial court.
- When the blockage arises from a disagreement between parties (joint ownership, creditor opposition), only a judicial procedure – interim relief or summons to the merits – can force the unblocking.
In practice, the formal notice often suffices to revive a dormant file. Field feedback varies on this point: some sellers receive a response within days, while others must escalate to the Chamber before seeing their file progress.
Modify the clauses of the preliminary agreement in advance
Some blockages can be avoided right from the drafting of the preliminary sales agreement. Including a partial escrow clause, which limits the amount held to the strict amount of identified debts, allows the seller to receive the balance more quickly after the signing of the final deed. This option remains underutilized, even though it significantly reduces the period of fund immobilization.
The blockage of money with the notary is never arbitrary. It reflects a regulatory constraint, an unsettled debt, or a disagreement between parties. Identifying the exact cause – by requesting a detailed status of the remaining verifications – remains the first useful action before considering any recourse.